AJAYA - RISE OF KALI (Book 2) by Anand Neelakantan

AJAYA - RISE OF KALI (Book 2) Reviews

• 
  Vishnu Chevli

  Video Review Link -
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt1S3...
  
  Awesome job by Anand Neelakantan
  
  
  
  "Ajaya - Roll of The Dice (Part 1) & Rise of Kali (Part 2)" is an epic written by Anand Neelakantan which shows Mahabharata from Duryodhana's point of view. I was unjust and hasty when I have written review of part-1, but I will correct my review as I have completed both the parts. I will re-write review for complete series "Ajaya".
  
  From our childhood, either we heard or watched (On Doordarshan) stories the Mahabharata. We accepted Pandavas and Krishna as hero. We accepted all loopholes in stories that came to our mind as divine intervention. Except Karna, We always imagined Suyodhana, Sushashana, Ashwathama as wrong doers. We never thought what could be the reason behind Bhishma, Drona, Kripa, Narayani Sena and other nobles support for Suyodhana in his struggle against Pandavas. We accepted available Mahabharata as recited by Ved Vyasa in front of Vaisampayana, but what if it was altered by the time it reached to us; what if Mahabharata as we know today is completely different from what it was actualy. It is winner who chooses what will go down to history. Neither Duryodhana nor his supporters won to continue his side of story. Anand has wonderfully portrayed how Duryodhana would be if his struggle for kingship was righteous.
  
  Detailed Review Link -
  http://chevusread.blogspot.com/2016/0...
• 
  Trupti Raswalkar

  I have always believed in the policy – if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all!
  So when I did not quite like Amish’s Scion of Ikshvaku,I decided not to put down my reaction in words.
  But Rise of Kali has actually disappointed me to a level that I am going to write a detailed review of it! Firstly I would like to make it clear, I am aware that I am nowhere near Amish’s or Anand Neelakantan’s level of excellence to actually review their work! They both are great authors! But this review is more of a reader’s reaction than a critical evaluation of the book.
  So here I go! Firstly I want to make a request to these authors, please don’t try to fit your books in a set formula! The similarity I found in both these books is that they used the same formula! Reflect social and political situation of current India in the Bharatkhanda of that time, bring out the issue of rapes, talk about the caste system etc etc. Both have tried too hard to connect situations prevalent today with ancient India!
  Now talking about Rise of Kali in specific – when I started reading Ajaya 1, I was mighty impressed till the first half of the book was over. I was almost sure this book would be one of my favourite books. But the second half actually shattered my hopes. The plot which seemed very clever, with all characters having different views on the same subject (none of them being evil), suddenly took a U- turn and resorted to the good vs bad cliche. It no longer remained to be the intelligent clash of ideologies but just about the good Duryodhan, bad Pandavas and the vicious Krishna!! Yes, now coming to the parts that hurt (yes hurt!) me the most! Let’s talk about the beginning itself. The vastraharan of Draupadi! The author has skipped through the incident as though it’s some trivial irrelevant incident! Many people (including me) actually believe it to be one of the main reasons behind the Mahabharat war! He has not even been clear about what exactly happens! Is she saved or not. If yes, by whom? (It made me appreciate more the wonderful interpretation in Chitra Banerjee’s book – Palace of Illusions). But in this book, author has conveniently skipped through the incident.
  Next is the portrayal of Krishna! Like any normal Indian kid, I have grown up listening to stories of Krishna! As I grew up and started reading mythology, I perceived him not as God, but as an extraordinary human being none the less! So I am completely fine with accepting that Krishna may not have been a God! But putting him out to be some kind of dhongi baba! There I have a problem! You can’t ridicule such an important character of Mahabharata just like that! Also, though the author has given references to Krishna’s divine / fake magical powers, he has nowhere explained how Krishna managed to showcase them. The author could have just lifted the veil of divinity and portrayed him as a normal person with vice and virtues! But he has used Krishna’s divine status instead to show him in bad light! Really great men (not necessarily good) till today are elevated to the level of God though they are not! They don’t necessarily have to be God or dhongi babas. They can just be extra ordinary human beings! Also Krishna is shown to be hell bent on bringing Duryodhan down. But if he really wanted that, he would have never tried to settle for five villages. But I have to say, at least in Rise of Kali he has reduced the intensity with which he wished to portray Krishna when he first introduced his character in Ajaya 1.
  Now let’s leave aside the emotions and talk about facts – First the story of Samba (Krishna’s son) being a rapist and raping Duryodhana’s daughter Lakshmana! I have never come across any reference to this incident. To write this review I have done some research as well. The findings reaffirm my knowledge and state that Samba wanted to marry Lakshmana , but she refused. So he kidnapped her and got caught. Later Balaram and not Krishna comes to rescue him. And as no one is ready to marry Lakshmana (she being abducted once), she is married to Samba! I could nowhere find reference to any rape of Lakhsmana by Samba or murder of Eklavya by Krishna because of that! And p.s: I completely sympathise with the unfair treatment with which Eklavya was met. I deduct one point from team Pandava for that (though I will not conveniently give that point to team Kaurava). Also if Duryodhan was such a fair and nice person, how did he give his daughter away to a rapist!
  Next, the story of Iravan. Mahabharat states Iravan died in the Kurikshetra war. Was rather killed in an unfair manner when fighting Shakuni. Also if one tries to refer the South folklore, it states Iravan voluntarily sacrificed himself!(I prefer to believe original version than folklores!).
  Moving ahead, as the author has given references to Geeta verses in the book, I also would like to quote one, which summarises the reason behind the Mahabharat war for me – “If you don’t fight for what you want, then don’t cry for what you lost!” And what is clear is that the throne of Hastinapur was something both Pandavas and Kauravas “desired”. It was nobody’s right by birth except Bhishma. Dhritharashtra was as illegitimate a child as the Pandavas! That makes Duryodhan also an illegitimate son of the Kuru clan! Next the character of Dhaumya. As far as I recollect his reference in Mahabharat, he met the pandavas during their exile when they were on their way to attend Draupadi’s swayamvar. He was referred to the Pandavas as their Kul guru by some Gandharva. I would like to know the author’s background reference that made him portray Dhaumya as the chief villain! Next is the character of Yuyutsu! As far as Mahabharat goes, Yuyutsu’s character is somewhat similar to Vibhishana from Ramayan. Frustrated with the humiliation and unfair treatment at the hands of his brothers (Kauravas), he provides intelligence information to Pandavas for the war. It has been very clear in the epic that Kauravas treated him badly due to his mother being a low caste. This makes me wonder, Duryodhana who respected and loved Karna, the sutaputra, how could he neglect and disrespect his own step brother? Was his friendship towards Karna, only because of his superiority against Pandavas? Also it brings into question the entire ideaology which Duryodhana is shown to have in this book. The ideaolgy that defines and defends him in this book. I would also like to point out that when Pandavas along with Draupadi decided to leave for the Himalayas, they left Yuyutsu as the guardian of Parikhshit, despite him being Dhritharashtra’s son and technically a kaurava plus a low caste. He was also made the king of Indraprastha! If they really believed in caste hierarchy and propagated animosity, why would they leave their grandson and Kingdom with Yuyutsu!
  Moving ahead I would like to point out the convenient assumptions made in the book like Shalya was not tricked but voluntarily supported Kauravas, Narayani sena was not asked for by Duryodhana but they themselves supported him and not their commander (which is unheard of as Kshatriyas prided themselves of the virtue of loyalty!) etc etc. Also wherever the epic mentions Duryodhana’s misdeeds, the author has conveniently ignored it and passed on the blame to someone else (palace of lac, attempt to murder Bheem etc etc).
  Also I would like to point out that the angle of patriotism which Duryodhana and his friends have shown in the book towards “India” has logical problems. India that time was not Bharat a single country, it was Bharatkhanda - A collection of many countries.
  Also the dark evil way with which scenes are narrated in the book gives me creeps. Eg - Shikhandi making lewd remarks towards Bhishma during the war, he dancing around Drona after he falls etc etc. Such style of narration makes the reader's opinion biased unnecessarily as it is not connected to the main incident, but just adds thorns to it. It is so especially for the readers who are not aware about the original epic in detail.
  I can go on and on about the technicalities. But all I want to say is that I was all ears for the story of the vanquished but sadly I was not convinced a single bit! I was looking forward to an unbiased practical version, where both sides have been show in grey shades, with their own rights and wrongs. But all I got to read was just a flipped version of the epic!
• 
  Bookish Indulgenges with b00k r3vi3ws

  I have said it before, and I will say it again. It is always a refreshing experience to read Anand Neelakantan’s books. I have been waiting for this book for around 8 months now and the author has made this book worth the wait.
  
  The second instalment starts with Draupadi being summoned after the Pandavas have lost her in a game of dice. Right from the first chapter the story continues its ‘tandav’ throughout the book. Do not misunderstand me when I say ‘tandav’ I mean it as a compliment. It is indeed havoc that is created through mere words on pages when Anand writes them. He forces people to acknowledge that there are always two sides to a coin. From the beginning of Roll of Dice, the author ensured that we let go of all that we think we know about Mahabharata and start afresh to see the side of the story that no one tells – the story of the Kauravas.
  
  While the stage was set and things started taking off in the first instalment, ‘Rise of Kali’ gives us an in-depth look into all the characters that play a role. Two people particularly stood out for me. One of them was Karna – while he did stand out in the original version with his diligence and loyalty, here we get to see everything that he had gone through. After reading his whole story, his loyalty to Duryodhana and his resilience takes on a new level. I admired Karna like no other in the story. The other was that of Balarama. While Krishna is widely known for his role in the Mahabharata, Balarama felt more humane and admirable in this version. Also, getting a look into Yuyutsu, the only surviving Kaurava was an added attraction in the book.
  
  The author maintains his comprehensive style of narration for most part. I personally felt that there could be more to the ending, but then I am someone who is always looking for more in a book. The language continues to be striking, complementing the author’s unique perspective on every character and relationship. It was interesting, engaging and entertaining.
  
• 
  Girish

  Anand Neelakantan's book starts with what seems like an apology for exploring the alternate POV. It talks about Hinduism openness to ideas, debates and discussions and quotes Bhagavad Gita (of all things) to let us know the position of the author.
  
  "Iti te jnananam akhyatam
  guhyad guhyatram maya
  vimrisyaitad aseshena
  yathecchasi tatha kuru
  [I have give you the most confidential of all knowledge. Analyse it critically and act as per your wish and understanding]"
  
  The sequel to the impressive Ajaya is actually a let down since it almost faithfully follows Jaya except for places where the author steps out to show how bad/misguided the Pandavas were. Once the dice were cast at the court of Hastinapur, it was difficult to make Suyodhana the righteous prince. And so he is painted an emotional, idealistic fool who is a bad administrator. Not really the stance I would expect after the first book.
  
  The stories of Karna and Ekalavya are somewhat newer. Ekalavya is made out to be the Nishada incarnation of Shiva with many characters seeing the third eye, including Krishna. He is almost the only one who is not manipulated by the cunning of Shakuni, except when he does get manipulated, it is to his own end. The story line of Samba and Lakshmana was horrific and a jolt. Ashwathama's constant need for validation from Suyodhana leads him to deeds beyond his dharma. So we have a Kshatriya, Suta, Brahmin and Nishada team up against the entire society to make it just and inclusive.
  
  In the end, the book only succeeds in villifying Krishna (which is not new) and retells the many stories from Mahabharata with no new novelty. The concept of Dharma is subtle and there are books that have explored it much better. (Why wasn't the brilliant 'The difficulty of being good' or Yuganta not part of the references?!).
  
  I felt Suyodhana was let down by many characters in Mahabharata, but the most regrettable one was that of this author author who set out to glorify his life. It was almost as if, he played it safe(relatively) by making it a zero sum game of no one being happy. For someone who was open for an alternate POV, the book lost it's way after part 1.
  
  But a good attempt nonetheless.
• 
  Pradeep S

  The Rise of Kali- raises the question, why the history never considered the virtues of the vanquished? Suryodhana was the voice of a castles society, which weighed the individual with merits. He accepted Karna- the son of a charioteer and offered him his eternal friendship. He did not ask Yudhishtira to pawn his wife on the dice games. He didn't do anything against Dharma in the war. Still he is the chief antagonist.
  
  Rise of Kali is the search through the mind of the greatest villain ever portrayed in our Epics. The war which was forced upon men by the tactful manipulation of Dharma and Adharma. When Bhishma was unarmed, he was killed by Arjuna. Guru Drona was cheated and killed. When Karna was unarmed, he was killed by Arjuna. Suyodhana himself was killed against the rules of the war by Bhima. And I wonder, who was on the path of Dharma!
  
  It was a mesmerising feeling when I read the conversation between Balarama and Krishna where Balarama is trying to convince his younger brother about the futility of war.
  Krisha Says to his elder brother that the wise do not grieve for the dead, nor love the living. The souls is immortal and pervades the entire universe. The soul has no death and birth and that the soul discards the body as we throw away soiled clothes and so on''
  To this, Balarama replies that to a mother who has lost a child. What you say is merely an intellectual exercise. It does not solve anything but acts as an excuse for violence'.
  There are so wordily duals like this throughout the book. It is as if the writer is asking these questions to himself and trying to fathom the justifications.
  
  The virtues of Suyodhana and Karna were lost in transition somewhere down the lines and now this work compel the reader to think deeper and raise questions in the reader's mind. Even the Dharma and Adharma is relative in their senses.
  A must read, to see the other side, where everyone forgot the virtues of the so called villains.
  
  Bhanumati, wife of Suyodhan says him that he will be painted as the greatest villain who ever lived, if he loses the war to which he answers calmly that 'fear of posterity cannot prevent me from doing what I know to be right'. Yes. He meant it.
• 
  Sujata Ravi

  'Rise of Kali: Duryodhana's Mahabharata' is the second book in the Ajaya series. Aptly titled 'Ajaya' the series is Anand Neelakantan's counterpoint to the traditional rendition of the Mahabharata or Jaya which casts the Pandavas in a victorious as well as righteous light.In Ajaya, Neelakantan establishes the reasons why the Kauravas, and Suyodhana (Duryodhana) in particular, believe they are engaged in a righteous war and rightly points out some of the shortcomings of the Pandava claim on the throne, and their activities in the war.
  I think Indian readers were ripe for a reinterpretation of the Mahabharata from Duryodhana's perspective and Anand Neelakantan takes up the cause of the Kauravas and elaborates their thoughts in an impressive manner. He describes in moving detail how Duryodhana and his ideologies are not evil, like we've always been told, but how do you say .. disruptive.. to the social structure of the time. Krishna, who is the prime mover of the entire war, is not as much in dismay of the wrongdoings of the Kauravas, but rather worried about how Duryodhana's ideas of allowing his citizens to break the rules of the caste heirarchy might allow the descent of society into chaos. As per the author's description, Duryodhana is unaffected by the strict rules of caste and creed and believes only the the merit of the doer. To him, it's of no significance that Karna is a charioteer born of a caste not meant to draw weapons.He sees that Karna is a proficient warrior, his skills surpassing even Arjuna's and makes him the King of Anga, giving him honorary status as a warrior. Duryodhana is described as being sympathetic to the plight of the Nagas and other lower castes, and he maintains that it is to prevent the further marginalisation of these oppressed castes that he wants to defeat the Pandavas, so that he can establish a society where everyone may be treated fairly.
  What I appreciated most about the book is that the author is ready to acknowledge the Kaurava's most blatant wrong in the epic, the unrighteous stance they take during the Draupadi Cheerharan. In the book, Duryodhana, Karna and Ashwatthama all acknowledge their failings when it comes to that lapse in reason,and dharma. I have long felt that the Pandava claim on the throne is non-existent or tenuous at best, because Duryodhana IS the eldest son of the king of Hastinapura. We have all traditionally settled for a righteous Pandava claim on the throne due to the wicked portrayal of Duryodhana. But even historically, it is known that Krishna and the Pandavas engineered several dubious circumstances during the war to get rid of Kaurava warriors of greater skill. The author touches on this treachery especially in the case of the death of Karna, Drona and Bhishma quite movingly. Lastly, Ajaya is a great portrayal of friendship, loyalty and unswerving belief in one's own cause.
  I really enjoyed Rise of Kali. Read it for an alternative perspective on by far the most interesting Indian story we know because for all you know, this is how it truly happened.
• 
  Pallabi Dutta

  *****I received a signed copy of this book for free through Goodreads First Reads. The views expressed here are my own and unbiased.
  
  3 stars.
  The blurb sounded so promising.
  
  The author has turned such a great epic into a horrid Retelling.
  
  The story started with Draupadi being dragged from her chambers to the sabha where the unspeakable cheerharan takes place. And the events directly leading after that. Minor characters like Ashwathama are given importance. We get to see Gandhar and their culture which has escaped from the real mahabharata mythology. Dear old Karna always held a soft spot in my heart. Though reading Duryodhana's Mahabharata didn't do justice to him as a character. I know that Mahabharata is about taking the right path. A battle between Dharma and Adharma. But reading the story it was getting a bit drag that the word Dharma kept popping up every tenth sentence. I am a huge fan of Indian Mythology but this book was just wasn't for me. A BIG FAT NO. NO.
  
  I am sorry. I really really really tried loving, liking.... after a while bearing this book but naah I couldn't come to love it. I felt the author was in hurry to finish the story because the ending didn't sit well with me.
  
  And the line "Ekalavya is called to make the ultimate sacrifice to uphold a woman’s honour in the summary- I think is quite misleading.
  
  And another thing which caught my eye was I felt every women shown in this retelling is either oppressed or hysterical or just mentally subdued or shown as power hungry. I mean c'mon the whole time reading this book all I felt was 'Man, Draupadi sounds like a mad hysterical women'. Not a pretty picture.
  That is all I could think right now. And probably I will recommend this book to only those people who are new to reading and have lot of time in their hand to actually get into the plot introduced by the author because sure as hell the author wasn't able to entice me into this story.
• 
  Manissh Ahuuja

  This book begins from the most infamous, and the most poignant chapter of Mahabharata. The dice game in which Pandavas' lose their entire wealth, kingdom and eventually they end up losing their wife, by gambling over a dice game orchestrated by Shakuni (who was playing on behalf of the Kauravas). If this situation would have been handled in a respectable manner by the Kauravas, probably the entire Kurukshetra war could have been avoided.
  
  The prime highlight of this book has to be the situations in which characters find themselves and how do they react to those situations. Their decisions are based on their past, influence, manoeuvring and manipulation by other characters. Vulnerability and indecisiveness of characters and the sinister plans of some of the characters is exposed to the reader with great panache and skill.
  
  Read a detailed post about this book on my blog:
  http://cogentdesi.blogspot.com/2015/0...
  
  
• 
  Balaji Sundarrajan

  i had already read ajaya I and was waiting for part II for a long time. it does not fail to disappoint. the book is gripping. unputdownable read. only thing is that, the story appears to travel very fast. the author could have opted for two more volumes. on the whole, i am very impressed with anand neelakantan's reinterpretation of the ithihasa. my knowledge of the mahabharata is quite good and i can say that anand's version is not only plausible but also strongly possible. loved the last chapter where the author discusses about dharma. on the whole, i can say that anand has managed to make me rethink about so many things that we had doubts about, but were afraid to ask, in our epics. as he himself puts it, he has made me 'read between the lines'. for this, i sincerely thank the author.
• 
  Kapil Shukla

  Mahabharat is an epic and to write concisely about your opinions, thoughts, after thoughts, views/actions is always be challenging for most. What i liked about this book is the chapters are focussed and short. What all people would know about would be after watching BR Chopras Mahabharat serial on tv. So this book i feel is important to view the other side on what possibly could have happened. There are plethora of questions raised on what is right and wrong and frankly no one today could answer those. But if you have only read/seen one part of the story then you would be influenced to think in a particular manner. This book introduces to other side and force you to think appropriately.
• 
  Rakhi Jayashankar

  
  After reading Ajaya1 , I could not hold myself from reading Ajaya2, out of curiosity to know how the author leads the story line further from Suyodhana's point of view. Unlike the first book, where there seemed to have a conscious effort to portray Suyodhana as righteous and Pandavas as evil, Ajaya 2 successfully reinforces that every one possess purely human feelings of jealousy, hatred,love, passion and dejection.
  Author portrayed the story with so much conviction that I felt if that it was exactly the real Mahabharatha.
  The story line involving Lakhsmana, Samba and Ekalavya and that of Iravan's fate is a new revelation. May be because of my lack of knowledge of the scripture, I haven't ever heard of the story, which surprised me.
  The interpretation of Geetha as a communication between Krishna and Balarama is a brilliant venture and the author succeeded in conveying the vast message in a few pages.
  The effort of compressing the scripture into two books is really praiseworthy.
  The confusion of the characters about the real Dharma and Adharma is the reflection and representation of a huge mass who gets caught up between the right and wrong.
  Another praiseworthy thing is that, even if, story is Duryodhana's Mahabharata, author reinforces that the protagonist was wrong in what the did to Draupadi.
  Only fact that disturbed me was that Krishna was portrayed in a bad light. At some points, I felt that Krishna was portrayed as the other side of Shakuni. Being an ardent Krishna devotee, it was disturbing. But towards the end there seems to have a clarity about Krishna's intentions and the author himself has given an explanation for the same.
  
  
  Kudos to Anand Neelakantan for spreading the message of peace and non violence as well as unity and equality from a book which is all about the greatest war in the history.
  A few typos took the cherry from the cake.
  All in all Ajaya 2 is a step ahead of its prequel.
  
  The biggest question is if kurukshetra saw victory of good over evil, then why does Kali rise
  
• 
  Shabnam Manji

  Ajaya: Roll of the Dice, the first part of this book had left me speechless. It was for the first time that I read the epic "Mahabharata" with such clarity. All Gods & sons of Gods became regular men and women. Mostly, the other side of the story got a say through Anand's words.
  
  There is thus no need to point that the second part of the book carried a lot of expectations. When I read the first few chapters of this book, I thought this book will be disaster. It seemed that the author was losing his chain of thought and the book felt lifeless.
  
  But I am glad I held on to my patience as the first few chapters were merely linking the first book to this one...
  
  Anand's words put in so much truth to the narrative that it was more like living a tale. I smiled at Krishna's jumbled words, fell in love with Karna's ideals, adored Bhanumati's devotion to Suyodhana, felt Suyodhana's passion & conflict of emotions, and most importantly understood how it would have been to walk in the shoes of men like Bhishma, Vidhura, Pandava/ Kaurava brothers who after all were all humans in the gamble called life. There was no right or wrong. Every one of them did what they thought was their definition of right. Each of them was human and it was time & history that made them all divine or monsters.
  
  Anand captures every emotion, every feeling with such sincerity that I wanted to live it a little more every time I read it... taking me a real long time to finish it!!
  
  All I would say is that Anand Neelkanthan does not disappoint you with his second offering to the vanquished and I look forward to his next epic!
• 
  Manpreet Kaur

  After reading the first book, I was highly impressed by the kind of plot and idea the author came up with. And I think I cannot express how eager I was to get into the second book in the series.
  However, I must say this book was like a roller coaster ride for me. Some parts of the book are so exceptionally well presented. I loved... oh! Is there some other word for expressing how excited and happy I was while reading some portions of this book.
  But there were some portions which didn't impress me much. I couldn't agree over how author built up some incidents. He could have done much better.
  This cannot be a reason to not like this book. I would still say I really really liked this book and all the readers who loved the first book would definitely enjoy this book also.
  I would suggest you not to skip reading the first book. Of course, you can easily catch up with the story for mahabharata is a well know epic and almost everyone knows about the war and all. But this different is very very different than the usual Mahabharata and thus you need to read the first book to get completely engrossed in the story and like the second book.
  In case you want a more detailed review of this book, check this link:
  http://www.finixpost.com/review-of-th...
• 
  Bhakti Motta

  Rise of Kali is book two of Ajaya – Epic of the Kaurava Clan series. If you have read Asura/Roll of the Dice and liked it then wait no more, go grab your copy of Rise of Kali. If you haven’t read Anand Neelakantan’s work before, then start with this book. Rise of Kali can be read as an independent book too.
  
  Rise of Kali starts with the famous or should I sayInfamous Panchali Cheerharan. Suyodhana (Duryodhana) and his brothers along with Karna, Aswathama and Shakuni have won the Dice game and whole of Indrapastha, making Pandavas their slaves. Suyodhana in his urge to satisfy his ego insults Panchali in front of whole sabha, thus shaming the whole Kaurava Clan.
  
  Pandavas leave their abode for Vanvas and Kauravas start resurrecting their status. Aswathama goes in search of Shakuni to Gandhara and Karna is forced to leave Hastinapur by Bheeshma. Suyodhana feels disabled without Karna and Aswathama in Hastinapur.
  
  There are few events in this book which I have never heard or read before, thus making this book more interesting. We know Mahabharata from Krishna ‘s point of view, Arjun’ s point of view and Panchali’s point of view too, but what about The Kauravas? What about Duryodhana?
  
  What I liked about this book is the way Suyodhana ‘s character, suyodhana’ s relationships with his friends and wife are essayed.
• 
  Prem

  "History is written by the victors" - Popular quote goes like that. Anand has tried to rewrite the epic from the losers PoV & very well succeeded in his retelling. The way he has interjected the known stories & his own imagination is a very commendable act. There are many characters I have heard in this story for the first time & they were played in very important roles in the story like Yuyutsu. Every character has a good enough role in this book & they have their own reasons. The one thing I noticed is that how this book related to the current Indian society. The untouchability issue, discrimination, women molestation, rape situation & political game plays for power, wealth - everything is so true, holds good even now. Lots of inspirations from the events happened in India between Ajaya I are being part of this book. There are many characters I liked especially Ekalaiva, Karna, Lashmana & the prime character of Suyodhana & his confusions, convictions about his stand on dharma, friendships are very well narrated. This is a more than a worthy successor to the previous part. I thoroughly enjoyed this book & its underlying viewpoints.
• 
  Natasha Borah

  It is really interesting to see how the author narrates the mythological aspects like boons and magical weapons in a believable and possible way. Like the part where Arjuna is supposed to meet Shiva and ask for his bow, Duryodhana being beaten by Bhima when striked on his thighs and so on. It is an advantage if you know the conventional Mahabharata or at least some stories of it. That way the story becomes more amusing as well as interesting.Read full review at
  Natasha'z Words
• 
  Ankita Dasgupta

  Finest writing EVER! If I loved Jaya, I love the Ajaya series even more.
• 
  Vishal Jha

  Just finished reading this and with this the Ajaya series comes to an end... the story leaves you amazed with its point of view from the side which is considered evil...
  It questions the well established beliefs of right and wrong...
  All this might sound a bit more like non-fiction but it is not, it is an amazing fiction and an amazing conclusion to an amazing series...
  The war scenes are described in a way that will make your heart race faster..
  Karna-suryodhana-Aswathama-eklavya friendship was the best part of the book
  Also the book leaves me a bit uneasy at the way few characters are portrayed but then this is a story and you are supposed to feel that way at the portrayal....
  I enjoyed reading this...
  Hope you enjoy it too....
• 
  Abhyudaya Shrivastava

  Expectations were huge from this book too as it is the continuation of the epic Mahabharata from another perspective and of course, the readers are curious to know more about the other side, or so to speak, of the fence. Well, the book begins with an author's note where he explains how he has learned the art of viewing things critically from Gita itself. He also has included Gita in his book but here the dialogue is between Krishna who is with Arjuna and is inclined toward war and Balrama who sympathizes with Suyodhana. Balaram is questioning Krishna and Krishna is justifying his acts in the name of Dharma. Author has also addressed the issue of showing Krishna in an unflattering light in his books.
  
  About the author
  This is Anand Neelkantan's third book after Asura and Ajaya (Part I). In his own words, he was born in a village with more than necessary number of temples. His tryst with mythology and religion started early on in his life and he has been fascinated ever since.
  
  About the book
  The cover has an ominous picture of a vulture flying in the face of solar eclipse. Just like the earlier book, this one also has been beautifully designed. The pages have a crisp feel to them. The typeset is of international standards. The blurb at the back reveals nothing but the basic premise of the book which is essentially- 'Mahabharata retold'. Praise from reputed newspapers and magazines like The Week and DNA are enough for one to be sold to the idea of the book.
  
  The language is simple with short sentences and fast narrative. The book is divided into 85 chapter for easy readability. A preview to the happenings in the previous book make the book a good purchase as a stand-alone product too.
  
  About the plot
  The book picks up the story from the scene of Game of Dice where Draupadi is mercifully pawned. Of course in this book, there is no magical Krishna to extend the saree of Draupadi as 'Dushasana' pulls on it. It is a less dramatic, but more believable version of the situation. The dialogues in the book are not low on drama though. Every line compels you to put yourself in the character's situation and feel his dilemma.
  
  The writing is divided in shorter paragraphs which are easy on the eye and the plot moves very smoothly. The book is a brilliant example of how to engage the reader through merely the use of dialogues and interesting situations. The author has used his imagination in most situations and although they might not be the real history of those times, they are definitely more realistic than the actual texts.
  
• 
  Vatsala

  It has been awhile since a release of a sequel filled me with this impatient sense of excitement mingled with curiosity (nostalgic about good old HP days:)).
  
  As I close (almost reluctantly) the last pages of Rise of Kali (RoK), I am surprised by this feeling of relief realizing that RoK was at par with the Roll of the Dice (RoD), if not better, for I have read too many sequels which have unwittingly wiped off the excitement and expectation created by the earlier book.
  
  It is refreshing to read about Mahabharata (MBH) from the eyes of all those persons who stood a little away from the blurred lines of (a)dharma. It is a misnomer to tag RoK as Duryodhana’s Mahabharatha, the strength of this book lies in the fact that it opens the reader to view the epic from the panes of divergent characters like Suyodhana, Ashwattama, Dhaumya, Yuyutsu, Eklavya and Yudhishtra while popular renderings have always been from the eyes of other noble souls like Karna, Krishna, Arjuna, Draupadi and Bhima.
  
  RoK is well written and neatly executed; the author has carefully interwoven interesting events and characters of MBH which are often ignored in popular retellings of the epic. If I have to choose one event from RoK to always remember I will choose that moment when Suyodhana, Karna and Ashwattama share a toddy from an untouchable woman.
  
  I enjoyed reading RoK and RoD and learnt some incredible facts about characters like Eklavya (I never knew anything about him other than his famed gurudakshina) and Yuyutsu (amazing – the only son of Dhirthirastra to have survived the war!). The more and more books and texts I read about MBH the more fascinating the epic is becoming.
  
  Recommended to all those who believe that MBH was all about good versus evil. Kudos to the author for doing his bit to ensure that the voices of the ‘other side’ of MBH get a stage, albeit under the covers of a fictional rendering.
  
• 
  Khyati Gulati Tewari

  Having read Roll of the Dice (Ajaya I), I was waiting for part II with much anticipation and author really took his time to release the second part.
  
  I have given the book a rating of 5 stars considering it as an individual book. But if I was to rate the book with respect to the first book, I would have given it 4 stars - for I liked the first part better.
  Why I say this is because, when I read the first part, the whole concept of the story being of the defeated side was new and thus proved most interesting. But then 2nd part at times felt dragged with saying the same things over and over again as were said in the 1st book. Though I feel, if the second book had come out sooner or better still if I had read both the books in one go, maybe this difference wouldn't have been apparent.
  
  Coming to book 2 in particular, what was most interesting was the voice given to people like Ashwathama and Shakuni. Loved how Mr. Neelakantan has portrayed Karna. Also what was interesting to read was the speech given by Bhishma pitamah explaining his reasons for backing Kauravas and how Dronacharya ji decided which side he would fight on.
  
  The whole concept of dharma and adharma was also well explained. And I especially loved how both sides justified that they were on the side of dharma. The tactics used by pandavas to win the war have been known forever so there was nothing new in there but what was new was the discussions that went on in the Kaurava camp each night.
  
  The book was fast paced and provided a fitting end to the story. A page turner and an epic read - if read with an open mind. Enjoyed reading the book a lot.
• 
  Ashwin Shetty

  The author rightly says, “There is nothing in India that has sparked more debate than the concept of dharma” and thus gives rise to his version of Mahabharata. I also would like to quote one, which summarizes the reason behind the Mahabharata war for me – “If you don’t fight for what you want, then don’t cry for what you lost!” Hence, when an author takes on the mantle of putting things in a different perspective and adding newer dimensions to the prism of dharma, the effort becomes quite commendable. At times Rise of Kali makes you question the very fundamental beliefs, so by no means is it an easy read. It hits you hard and then shakes you again. Rise of Kali raises questions that you've always asked yourselves and then forces you to ask even harder questions. Every page makes you stop and ponder which is what the original epic was meant to do in the first place. Only negative thing is that, the story appears to travel very fast. The author could have opted for two more volumes. on the whole, I am very impressed with Anand Neelakantan's reinterpretation of the ithihasa. My knowledge of the Mahabharata is quite good and I can say that Anand's version is not only plausible but also strongly possible. I can say that Anand has managed to make me rethink about so many things that we had doubts about, but were afraid to ask, in our epics as he himself puts it, he has made me 'read between the lines.
• 
  Venkat S Lolla

  Having had been a huge fan of Anand's writings, reading this book turns out to be phenomenal experience. Though the book indicates itself as "Duryodhana's Mahabharata", to me all the minute important facts that were a part of the great Mahabharata Epic were presented in a frank & upright way. I have been reading comics and books around Mahabharata ever since a child but none of the books till date gave me more insights on the characters of Ekalavya, Balarama, Karna and Ashwathama. Anand succeeds immensely in bringing these characters to light and gives them a voice to express themselves. The conversations between Balarama & Krishna, Krishna & Arjuna regarding "Dharma" are explained in a very subtle way that makes even a first time reader end up with Intriguing thoughts. Few of these questions perhaps came in to our minds when we read Mahabharata earlier but we never ever bothered to ponder upon and look forward for an answer. Anand through "Rise of Kali" succeeds immensely in racking up the questions on "Dharma" and for sure gives all of us enough food for thought. The afterword for the book is amazing. I could finish reading the book in flat 3 days thanks to the excellent & simple prose put in. Overall, a delightful read and a "must" recommended book for all. I look forward for such exciting works from Anand in the coming days !
• 
  Vikalp Trivedi

  I egerly waited for this book as I loved 'Roll Of The Diece' , and the wait for this book is worth it . This book is a gem . The title of the book suggests the book as 'Duryodhana's Mahabharata' but it is not only his Mahabharata . It is the story about an age and it's people who stucked in a fight of rights and wrongs of their own perspectives . Anand has brilliantly voiced many of the unknown stories of the epic . Anand proves it brilliantly that there is no black or white , there is always a grey area in which everyone acts . Retelling such a great epic without being biased to either side is a mark of a great writer . Every character is strongly built with its own virtues , vices and vulnerabilities and every character is somewhere at war with its own conscience .
  
  I loved especially those chapters where Gita is questioned by the author once via Balrama and later by Arjuna . And the later chapters where the so called victors realise what they had done . It is a more human version of the Mahabharata rather than a 'devine' story of victory of good over evil . The afterword is awesome .
  
  Absolute Brilliance By Anand Neelakantan .
• 
  Khyati Tiwari

  The first half of the book brought in hope and finally as promised Duryodhan did see the end as a hero's demise. The illusion of all goody good Pandavas was torn apart. The balance striked with the story of Duryodhan's daughter being abused by Krishna's son. This was unknown to me, as it would be for most. The thing which was a little unpalatable was that parallels are drawn between Krishna and Sakuni. When we think of the Geeta Sar, it rests its case on not worrying about the outcome and just focus on perseverance. This book somehow draws it towards the ideology of only ends matter and means don't. Once you are through with the war, one might not care how one wins it, what matters is that you win; which is absolutely opposite of what Gita Sar teaches. I would have expected Krishna's character to be more neutral, more like Balram's. There is no equating Sakuni with Krishna, even if it is a retelling. The final chapter on subtlety of Dharma is the icing on the cake, one of the best summaries of Mahabharata that I have read.
  
  Overall the author keeps the grip till the end. But at times one might face the judgemental self struggling with the reality of the book.
  
  
• 
  Gomati

  Must read. It lived up to the expectation. Reading the great epic from a totally unexplored and ignored perspective of the Kauravas was refreshing. What I loved the most was how each of the character was drawn up in flesh and blood, like real life personalities and not the mythological characters that we are blindly biased about. Even Krishna was no longer the divine presence who could do nothing wrong. The frailties and whims of the human mind. The strengths and weaknesses of our egos. The illusionary aura and magnetism of power. And the worst, the price of power and politics, often played by the powers-to-be and paid by the common man. I would have preferred a slightly slower narrative of the post war events. A chapter could have been dedicated on the Bhagvad Gita, which is the most important part of the Mahabharata. It could have helped build up the case better to explain the actions of the Pandavas post war. But on the whole, no complaints. Loved every minute with it.