Get It Now How To Think Ahead In Chess Devised By I.A. Horowitz Released Through EPub

but not Great

This was one of the first Chess books I bought to begin to learn how to play advanced chess back in the's.
It is a reasonably good book that will give the beginning player some anchors in their journey to becoming more than a recreational chess player,

That having been said, the selection of the Stonewall Attack as an opening for White leaves a lot to be desired, This is one of the most anemic and ineffective openings you can use against an experienced player, It leads to a closed opening which is really more the domain of the advanced player who understands positional and strategic chess, The only real benefit to the Stonewall attack is hoping your opponent won't see a bishop sacrifice and quick mating attack, It is easily defended against, Once it is defended against, White quickly loses the initiative and Black moves on to a strong game,

Better suited for the beginner are King's pawn openings that bring tactics to bear in open games, Once this is understood then there are far better Queen's pawn openings to explore than the Stonewall Opening, Even the Colle System, which is similar and touched upon in this book is more practical than the main line taught here,

That being said, however, the book does benefit the beginner by giving them a repertoire ofbasic openings to where they can begin to go into their first tournaments or local chess clubs with a plan and some understanding of how to handle an opening.
This should be more than enough to give them a leg up against any inexperienced player who has no plan,

Once you've understood and mastered this book, be prepared to set a lot of it aside and relearn some things as you move ahead,

Really, that is the primary criticism, There are plenty of good primers out there that give more practical openings to work on that will lead to something you can better build on later,

So take it or leave it, It was a help to me and I've gone on to be a reasonably strong player, but it's not a book that excites me now that I know enough to look back on it and see what it did for me.
Any book by Bruce Pandolfini for the beginning player should be chosen over this one, I am rating this as it strikes me now I would have rated it higherback the first time I wrote is some decades ago, Basically, I think it has not stood the test of time, Still, hoping that some day I can move my own chess play out of the novice level, I can see reason to recommend this work to other novices, This book often references specific pages in sitelinkWinning Chess: How To See Three Moves Ahead, also cowritten with sitelinkFred Reinfeld, so consider reading that first or at least having it on hand especially if you are especially new to chess.
the

references are for pins, revealed checks, forks, and other strategic arrangements mentioned without explicit definition,

Now, why I feel it is dated, First, this is a book celebrating the queen pawn opening and the Stonewall Attack, At the time I first read this I was playing often with newer chess software and computer devices, At the time, it seemed such machines could be easily fooled from such an opening, Now, I think modern ones are onto it, Those older chess computers had been vulnerable to the Stonewall because the positions are usually without clear tactical lines, White simply prepares for an assault by bringing pieces to aggressive posts, without making immediate tactical threats, By the time the computer realizes that its king is under attack, it is often too late, This, however, is not the case with newer chess computers, Even in the early 's when I began to play others online at a site called Achess, others started to explicitly point out the inherent problems of leading with the queen pawn.
The downsides to the Stonewall, specifically, are the hole on e, and the fact that the darksquared bishop on cis completely blocked by its own pawns, If Black defends correctly against White's attack, these strategic deficiencies can become quite serious, Because of this, the Stonewall Attack is almost never seen in masterlevel chess any more, let alone my own playing,

Still, study of the techniques here are valuable in advancing strategic thinking, For me, I think this has helped me incorporate a fianchetto generally or even "dragon" bishop in my play, this being a necessary response to the Stonewall walling in its own darksquared bishop.


Another dating of this text is the use of sitelink"English" descriptive notation whereas I think anyone reading more modern texts will expect sitelinkAlgebraic chess notation, being more compact than descriptive chess notation and the most widely used method.


Stil being a product of its time and looking back, masterlevel games are used throughout a chapter for illustration, including some by Morphy buried not far from my home and sitelinkAlexander Alekhine.


Interestingly, the author here places the work at a time when King pawn openings were being eclipsed by the then crafty Queen pawn ones:

In, when Frank Marshall was preparing to sail for London to play in an international master tournament, he approached friends with the halfcomic, halfplaintive query: "What defense shall I play againstPQ.
. . " If one of the greatest players in the history of this game felt this way after thirty years, what are we mortals to say

The fact is that finding a defense againstPQis no laughing matter! Most of us have been brought up onPK, and we find something uncongenial in the lines of play which eveolve fromPQ.

I am learning this game so this book was very helpful, Mike's been swotting up too, so I've only beat him once, so far, Game on. Just reread this book. It's too bad there is no Kindle version,

This is the book that showed me how to finally beat my father in chess after ten years of losing, I knew how to play since I was, but never knew about openings, middle or end games until I read this book, I beat my father so easily after reading this that he never played me again,

The criticisms are valid about the stonewall opening not holding up today, but if he was writing it now he would probably use the London system as an opening for white.


Remember the specific opening is not the point of the book although he does say beginners should stay away from king pawn openings, it's that using the same opening repeatedly gets you so familiar with the position that you know the strengths and weaknesses and can start to think several moves ahead and make a long term strategy for the game you're playing which is how you advance from a beginner to an intermediate player.
If you want to master the finer art of chess planning go no further than this book, Very good book that gives practical advice for chess players who are more than amateurs but definitely not grandmasters Israel Albert Horowitz,