Get It Now Anthropology As Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment In The Human Sciences Designed By George E. Marcus Available Through Digital Edition

argument has dated, but the book is fantastic as a historiographical essay, Marcus ve Fishcer'in kitabını başlığı itibariyle bir antropolojiye giriş metni olarak düşünmüştüm, yanılmışım, Kitap etnografi ve antropoloji ilişkisini ele alıp antropolojinin bugüne nasıl geldiğini anlatıyor, Fakat burada kitap vakıaları açıklamak yerine bolca ismi art arda sıralayarak bir bilgi yığını inşa ediyor, Bahsettiği metinlere yönlendirmesi açısından tabi ki kıymetli bir çalışma olsa da benim kanaatim yazım stilinin kıymetin örtecek ölçüde problemli olduğu yönünde.
Fena bir okur olmadığımı, en azından bir metni üç aşağı beş yukarı takip edebildiğimi düşünüyorum ama bu metni takip etmekte, bitirmekte ciddi anlamda zorlandım.
Uzun ve zaman zaman bir yere bağlanmayan cümleler, referanslara ve isimlere boğulmuş ara başlıklar, referansların bütün okurlar tarafından bilindiği varsayılıp bunlar hakkında yapılan detaylı fakat bağlamsız yorumlamalar.
. .


Diğer bir sorunsa kitabın baskısı, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları'nın ufak puntoları ve düşük aralıklı baskısı herhangi bir göz problemi olmayan beni bile çok yoruyor.
Buku ini disarankan dibaca dengan suasana santai, karena isinya adalah kajian kritis yang singkatnya :

Penjelasan Penilaian ulang ideide dominan di seluruh ilmu manusia yang mengarah pada ilmu sosial konvensional yang pada akhirnya meluas ke ranah pengetahuan : hukum, seni, arsitektur, filsafat, sastra, dan bahkan ilmuilmu alam.


Penilaian ulang ini lebih menonjol dalam beberapa disiplin ilmu daripada yang lain, tetapi kehadirannya meresap,

Buku ini mengkritisi ideide itu sendiri yang diserang, tetapi juga gaya paradigmatik di mana ideide itu disajikan,

Khususnya dalam ilmuilmu sosial, tujuan pengorganisasian disiplin ilmu secara abstrak, generalisasi kerangka kerja yang mencakup dan memandu semua upaya penelitian empiris secara fundamental ditantang dan ini akan terasa sedikit pragmatis.


Buku ini juga menampilkan makalah Clifford Geertz, "Blurred Genres"b yang berusaha mengkarakterisasi tren saat ini dengan mencatat peminjaman ide dan metode yang mengalir dari satu disiplin ilmu ke disiplin lainnya.


Namun, Geertz mencoba untuk menganalisis dilema dari berbagai disiplin ilmu, Sementara masalah hilangnya teoriteori yang mencakup tetap sama dari disiplin ke disiplin, formulasi dan tanggapan terhadap kesulitan ini bervariasi,

Satu contoh kasus misalnya, dalam kritik sastra, telah memudarnya "kritik baru", sebuah paradigma yang menegaskan bahwa makna teks sepenuhnya dapat dieksplorasi dalam konteks konstruksi internalnya.


Nah,sekarang, kritikus sastra telah memasukkan, di antara gerakangerakan lain, teoriteori sosial tentang produksi dan penerimaan sastra lihat Lentricchiadan diskusi yang luar biasa dalam karya Elizabeth.
Bruss's Beautiful Theories,.

Dalam hukum, telah muncul kritik demistifikasi oleh gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis dari model otoritatif panjang penalaran hukum lihat, misalnya, Livingston,

Dalam seni, arsitektur, serta sastra, teknik yang dulunya memiliki nilai kejutan atau persepsi yang diorientasikan kembali, seperti surealisme, kini telah kehilangan kekuatan aslinya, sehingga memicu perdebatan tentang sifat estetika postmodernis lihat Jameson.


Dalam teori sosial, kecenderungan tersebut tercermin dalam tantangan terhadap positivisme kemapanan lihat Giddens,,

Dalam ekonomi neoklasik, hal itu diekspresikan dalam krisis peramalan dan kebijakan ekonomi,

Sepertinya banyak hal yang dikritisi dan menimbulkan rasa penasaran pembaca untuk jauh mengetahui epistemologi dari masingmasing keilmuan berikut fondasi informasinya, Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences by George E, MarcusThis was just rough to read that I am not smart enough to get it the first time Bir yayında nasıl bu kadar yazım hatası olabiliyor Bu kadar karmaşık bir konu böyle kötü bir çeviri ile berbat edilmiş.
Using cultural anthropology to analyze debates that reverberate throughout the human sciences, George E, Marcus and Michael M. J. Fischer look closely at cultural anthropology's past accomplishments, its current predicaments, its future direction, and the insights it has to offer other fields of study.
The result is a provocative work that is important for scholars interested in a critical approach to social science, art, literature, and history, as well as anthropology.
This second edition considers new challenges to the field which have arisen since the Anthropology as Cultural Critique's original publication, I've just reread this,years after it first came out andyears after my first time through, Given the changes in how we understand the 'crisis of representation' the social sciences or, what are we writing about and how do we write about it and the developments in postmodern analysis I'd expected it to have lost some of its edge.
Although in some ways the debates have moved on and the social sciences have become less selfreferential and less experimental the case itself remains fresh.
The case studies have moved from being cutting edge moments in the new ethnography I have trouble convincing my students born inthat an ethnography published almostyears before they were born is cutting edge most of the texts have become canonical.
What remains powerful though is the case that ethnographies of experience and of worldhistorical political economy can provide frameworks to build cultural criticism either as epistemological critique or comparative social analysis although I suspect it helps that ove the years I've read most of their case studies and continue to refer to some of them.
Marcus and Fischer write with passion for their subject and for the act of writing itself and

have given us an excellent text, and unlike some of the similar work in my own discipline area history a sustained and politically focussed text that avoids some of the excesses of historiographical selfreferentiality so often from Keith Jenkins his crew don't pass it by just because the publication date is.
George Emanuel Marcus is an American professor of anthropology at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on the anthropology of elites, .